David C. Hughes, Writer

“For the LORD your God will bless you in all your harvest and in all the work of your hands, and your JOY will be complete." –Deuteronomy 16:15

Archive for the category “Daily”

Head Games (2014-09-03 Daily) [Part 1 of 2]

Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil walks about like a roaring lion, seeking whom he may devour.

—1 Peter 5:8 NKJV

 

I contend that no other artistic medium is as intensely cerebral as writing.  But then again, I’m a wee bit biased as I continue to perfect the vocation that chose me rather than the other way around.  No other endeavor so intensely integrates my head and my heart, and no other aspiration is as sensitive to the well-being and constancy of both.

Because of the emotion spent during the writing process, I’ve discovered that recklessly depleting the reservoir of creative energy by partaking in fleshly indulgences is not only unwise, it’s potentially self-destructive.  Granted, there’s nothing like a jot of angst to coax out some good poetry, and there’s much to be said about a restless night resulting in an inspired essay, but over the years I’ve learned that writing is indeed a joust between me and the devil in the arena of intellect, and there’s nothing Satan would like better than to knock me off my horse.  I cannot afford to participate in his head games, so I fight on.

Before I dove into full time writing, I eased into this lifestyle by first transitioning to part time status at my former place of employment.  I have a degree in electrical engineering, and for 27 years I plied my trade in the defense industry as both an electronic hardware engineer and as a system integrator.  This profession exercised my intellectual capacity, but I fought to merge the logical with the creative throughout my career.  As I moved into part time engineering mixed with part time writing, I discovered that switching between logic and creativity was more challenging than I’d imagined.

At first I fixed my schedule to work at the company two 10-hour days per week, Monday and Tuesday.  But to accommodate my manager and the company’s desire to retain the best use of my services and capability, I had to settle for working shorter hours on Monday, Tuesday, and Thursday.  I reserved Wednesday and Friday for writing.  Each week I’d start out fresh, working my engineering job with as much energy and focus as I could muster.  Because I had to work efficiently to squeeze in practically a full week’s worth of effort into 20 hours, I knuckled down, rolled up my analytical sleeves, and focused.  Leaving work Tuesday night each week was like stepping out of an August afternoon in Texas and striding into a walk-in cooler—the relief was palpable as I looked forward to Wednesday morning’s writing session.  But after a few weeks on this schedule, I realized something: my left brain stubbornly resisted my right brain’s necessity to take over for the day.  Like two bickering siblings, my logical mind wouldn’t play nicely with my creative mind, so writing became a wrestling match.  Over time my ability to switch from logic to creativity and back again improved, but this experience opened my eyes to the dependence of producing good work on the clarity of my mind.  Writing full time magnified this reality even further.

“Writing, to me, is simply thinking through my fingers,” wrote Isaac Asimov, but if the thinking part is compromised, the writing part will reflect the weakness, and the devil wins the match.  Oddly enough, caffeine is my worst offender.

One Sunday morning, as we finished breakfast and prepared to replace rusted-out body panels on my father-in-law’s 1926 Model T Ford Coupe, my wife’s cousin, Dane, said something that resonated in me.

“If I have too much coffee,” he declared, “all I want to do is organize things.”

Ha!  I couldn’t believe it—I’m the exact same way.  After my first cup of coffee in the morning I can think.  After my second cup I can no longer think, but I can do.  After my third cup I organize.  But I can’t organize my thoughts at all after the first cup.  My mind buzzes, scattering any contemplations to the four corners of the office.  The writing sucks as I struggle to tie points together in a logical progression to form a blog post, a chapter, or a short story.  If I’m doing research, the information I’m reading goes in one eye and out the other; nothing sticks.  Over the years I’ve been forced to give up soda and energy drinks because the stimulants upend my thought process.  Energy shots wreak havoc with my creativity.  Even vitamin B supplements designed to boost energy derail my thinking. They also make me twitch.

 

(continued)

 

Copyright © 2014 by David C. Hughes

The Insidious El Why (2014-08-26 Daily)

It slipped into my consciousness early one morning, originating perhaps from a faded dream or springing from something I’d recently read.  Maybe it had arisen from an odd whisper, a snippet of lyrics, a silly aside uttered by my goofball daughter, or an observation expressed by my wife, a master of sarcasm.  From wherever it came, the idea ended up spilling across the palette of words that I grasped in my imagination, beseeching me to paint it across the computer screen and imploring me to post it to my blog page or add it to a book chapter.  So I obeyed, as I always do.

I typed with passion, broad strokes at first, followed by more subtle touches, a hint of light here, a dash of emotion there.  Words linked with words, dancing the Conga one after another, hands on waists and rhythm on hips as they scrolled their way back and forth, to and fro, up and down the page, laughing with the joy of just doing what they do best: inviting all to participate.  I joined them with gladness in my soul and life in my fingers.  Hours later I beheld my work—our work—the melding of Spirit with spirit, reflecting the essence of purpose, fulfilling my design as an image bearer to the Most High God.  I wept.

For a week after I’d completed the piece, I nipped and tucked, polished and honed, tweaked and folded, cut and pasted.  The page radiated life and coaxed out my joy.  I reveled in gladness, and suddenly I wanted to share it with a congregation of kindred souls: my read-and-critique group.  They would appreciate the passion!  They would treasure the art!  They would recognize the hunger, the longing, the labor of love as I read the sentences, enunciating each word as I spread my good cheer like soothing balm upon the yearning ears of my fellow scribes.

I read, they listened.  I finished, they began.  I smiled outwardly, I groaned inwardly.  As they sliced up my baby I reminded myself this was for my own good, dammit, that we learn the most from our mistakes, that trials build character, that whatever doesn’t kill us only makes us stronger.  Blah blah blah . . . .

“You have too many El Why words,” they professed.  “Use stronger verbs.”  Yes, I thought.  Of courseStronger verbs.  “Stomped” instead of “treaded heavily.”  “Picked” instead of “ate slowly.”  “Reflected” instead of “sat thoughtfully.”

I recognized threads of truth uttered by my hero, Stephen King, channeled through their razor-edged critique: “I believe the road to hell is paved with adverbs,” he wrote, “and I will shout it from the rooftops.”  Yes, I admit that sometimes my writing walks proudly, er, um, marches down the road to perdition.  Or off the edge of rooftops.  “Nouns and verbs are the guts of the language,” declared A.B. Guthrie, Jr. “Beware of covering up with adjectives and adverbs.”  How could we ever become comfortable exposing our hearts to the world if we insist in covering them up with the leathery skin of lazy writing?  “Personally, I think the ‘Potter’ books have too many adverbs and not enough sex,” observed Lev Grossman.  At one time my wife and I discussed how we could outdo Fifty Shades of Gray.  Then the adverbs got in the way.

Like houseflies and fire ants, however, adverbs still do have their place, albeit a position of ignobility.  This truth was driven home recently when I attempted to read a popular inspirational book recommended by a good friend.  I was eager to crack the covers, breathe in the heady scent of fresh paper and new ink, and dive into the promised ocean of enlightenment, only I ended up treading water in a fishpond infested with inspiration-eating amoebas.

Thinking it would grow on me as I read further, I dog-paddled my way through the opening few chapters, wondering why the writing grated on me like the insistent questioning of a six-year-old kid.  Then it slapped me upside the head: throughout the book, the author had substituted adjectives where the adverbs should have been.  It was a case of misplaced modifiers, by Jove!  Once I realized this oddity, though, I just couldn’t get past it; I ended up stuffing the book back on the shelf.  Forcefully.

Henry James once said, “I adore adverbs; they are the only qualifications I really much respect.”  I don’t know if I’d go so far as to say I adore adverbs—I don’t adore houseflies or fire ants—but I recognize their function.  And like grace notes sprinkled throughout a symphonic piece, or tasteful trim applied to the lines of a house, well-placed adverbs can add a flourish to a good sentence or a little sprucing up around the edges.  So the next time you’re tempted to cut out one of those insidious El Why words, consider this: adverbs, like nose hairs and spam email, have a function.  Subscribing to the philosophy of “all things in moderation,” have at it!  Just make sure the adverb of choice is the best word for what you want to convey and how you want to convey it.  And for God’s sake, I implore you: please don’t substitute adjectives, or any other parts of speech, in place of them.  This may cause your reader to throw vehemently, er, um, heave your book through the wall.  Gracelessly.

 

Copyright © 2014 David C Hughes

Post Navigation